Servant
Leadership School
September 21, 2003
Hermeneutic Methods
Hermeneutics is the science and art of interpreting the Scriptures.
There are different approaches –
1.
Symbolic approaches
Many through church history have taken a symbolic approach to the
Scriptures.
Augustine taught that every scripture had four levels of
understanding: The “letter” which was the literal understanding, the “allegory” which was a symbolic
interpretation, the “moral” understanding
which gave a sense of what we were to do or not to do, and the “anagogy” which was a kind of deeper,
mystical, spiritual understanding.
While Scripture may indeed be very, very deep, and may have many levels of
understanding to it, the problem with this approach is that you’ll find that
with each teacher, you’ll have a different interpretation as to what the verse
means.
I have a hard time thinking that God meant for us to be confused as to what
His Word means.
You’ll find these kinds of approaches in the very ancient commentaries.
It is proper to interpret Scripture symbolically, but only when the text is
clearly symbolic.
There are different types of writings that require that we interpret things
as symbolic, such as parts of Daniel and Revelation. The parables of Jesus also have a symbolic
part to them as well.
2.
Disconnected
This approach comes in many forms, but the idea is that you take a single
verse and make it say whatever you want.
a.
Proof Texting
This is where you will find a person taking a text to prove their point,
and twisting the meaning of the passage to make it fit their theology.
Example:
The Mormons take the following verse as if it’s referring to Joseph Smith:
(Ezek
37:16-17 KJV) Moreover, thou son of man,
take thee one stick, and write upon it, For Judah, and for the children of
Israel his companions: then take another stick, and write upon it, For Joseph,
the stick of Ephraim, and for all the house of Israel his companions: {17} And
join them one to another into one stick; and they shall become one in thine
hand.
For a person who is not versed in the Bible and not
familiar with Ezekiel, this can knock you off guard. Until you study your Bible and come to
realize that it’s talking about the split kingdom, the southern kingdom which
was known as Judah, and the northern kingdom which was known as Ephraim, or,
Joseph (who was the father of Ephraim), and their eventual reunification.
b.
Springboarding
This is what many pastors were taught in the old days, to pick a “text” and
build your sermon on it.
Usually what it meant was for the pastor to read the text, make a brief
comment on it, and then launch into the things he really wanted to say. For
many churches it meant that the pastor would talk about staying away from the
movies, giving, and being baptized …in every sermon.
3.
Grammar and History
This is the approach we take with interpreting Scripture.
We base our interpretation of Scripture upon what the passage is saying grammatically, and upon what the historical circumstances were.
Grammar
This means getting down to finding out what the text is saying (more on
this next week)
Historical
Understanding the historical context of the book helps us understand what
is happening.
Knowing when Isaiah was written answers a lot of mysteries, once you begin
to learn about the Assyrian empire that ruled during Isaiah’s day.
Understanding Paul’s life and when he wrote the various epistles helps you
understand the kinds of things he’s dealing with.
Culture
Sometimes it’s important to understand the way Bible cultures worked.
(1 Cor
11:5 KJV) But every woman that prayeth
or prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head: for that is even
all one as if she were shaven.
Some churches take this and the following verses to mean
that women today must wear head coverings of some kind (either a hat or a
veil). But it helps to understand that
in Paul’s day in Corinth, only
prostitutes that walked around without their heads covered. Could Paul simply be saying that women should
be careful about looking like a prostitute when they come to church?
(1 Tim 2:15 KJV)
Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in
faith and charity and holiness with sobriety.
Though this single verse might sound as if Paul is saying
that a woman can be saved by giving birth to children – it helps to remember
that historically childbearing was a dangerous thing. Many women died in childbirth. It makes more sense to see this verse as Paul
comforting women who are afraid of giving birth because after all they will be
saved and go to heaven as long as they continue trusting in Jesus.
The
plain sense is the main sense.
God doesn’t try to hide His real meaning behind secret codes that only a
select few can understand.
Usually, the plain sense is the correct one.