Sunday Evening Bible Study
February 11, 1996
Introduction
Paul
is writing to a group of churches which he had helped to establish.
After
having established these churches, there were a group of teachers called
"Judaizers" who came in and began spreading their own doctrines.
The
Judaizers felt that a Gentile couldn't really be saved apart from first
becoming a Jew, and that started by being circumcised.
What
is at issue is whether or not a Christian is supposed to strive to keep the law
to be saved, or to "stay saved".
We've
seen that Abraham himself received God's righteousness by believing, not
through works.
And
last week we saw how easily it is to fall under the curse of the law, that all
you have to do is blow it once, and you are guilty of breaking the whole law.
And
Jesus died to free us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us,
dying on the cross.
Jesus
did this so that we Gentiles might receive the kind of blessings promised to
Abraham in God's covenant with him.
Verse
14 -
14 That the blessing of Abraham might come on
the Gentiles through Jesus Christ; that we might receive the promise of the
Spirit through faith.
Now ...
We're
getting kind of a taste of how righteousness came to Abraham simply by
believing.
But
how does all this work together?
How
am I to approach the Old Testament and the law?
:15-18
The covenant of promise
:15
though it be but a man's covenant ...
NIV
- 15 Brothers, let me take an example from everyday life. Just as no one can
set aside or add to a human covenant that has been duly established, so it is
in this case.
Paul
is saying that even with a human contract, you don't go adding or subtracting
from it any time you want.
Only
the concerned parties can change the contract.
Illustration:
Let's
say that you and I make an agreement for me to wash your windows every week for
a year.
We
write up a formal contract, and then sign it.
If
Dave then comes up and makes a contract with you, does that cancel my contract?
No.
Only
you and I together can change our contract.
Or
I'll take you to court and sue the pants off you.
:16
to Abraham and his seed were the promises made
Which
promises?
God
made lots of promises to Abraham. Some
of them are ...
Genesis
12:7 And the LORD appeared unto Abram, and said, Unto thy seed
will I give this land: and there builded he an altar unto the LORD, who
appeared unto him.
Genesis
17:7 And I will establish my covenant between me
and thee and thy seed after thee in their generations for an everlasting
covenant, to be a God unto thee, and to thy seed after thee.
Genesis
22:16-18 And said, By myself have I sworn, saith the
LORD, for because thou hast done this thing, and hast not withheld thy son,
thine only son: 17 That in blessing I
will bless thee, and in multiplying I will multiply thy seed as the stars of
the heaven, and as the sand which is upon the sea shore; and thy seed shall
possess the gate of his enemies; 18 And
in thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed; because thou hast
obeyed my voice.
:16
He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed,
which is Christ.
Did
you notice how many of the promises mentioned Abraham's "seed"?
The
word "seed" is an unusual word.
"Seed"
can refer to one kernel.
"Seed"
can refer to a whole basket of seed.
"Seeds"
can also refer to more than one seed.
When
we see the promises to Abraham in Genesis, we typically understand the term
"seed" to be "collective", meaning a group of people, as in
the Jews.
But
here Paul brings out a subtle thing from the text, noting that Moses didn't use
"seeds", but the singular form "seed".
Ultimately,
God's promises to Abraham and his "seed" were promises fulfilled in
one person, in Jesus.
:17
... cannot disannul
The
Judaizer who is listening to Paul's arguments about Abraham might eventually
cave in to Paul's argument that Abraham was made righteous simply because of
his faith in God.
"But",
the person might reply, "Everything changed when God made a new agreement
with Moses!"
Paul
now brings back this idea of human agreements (from verse 15), and says that
just because there was a new agreement with Moses, doesn't mean that God's
original contract with Abraham was null and void.
The
original contract with Abraham was yet to be fulfilled!
It
would be fulfilled in Jesus.
:18
if the inheritance be of law, it is no more of promise
There's
a difference between righteousness that is given by a promise, and
righteousness that is earned by the law.
Illustration:
Abraham's
promise is like me promising to give you $30 just because I like you.
Righteousness
through the law is like me saying I'll give you $30 if you come and clean my
house.
Paul
is saying that if the rules changed with Moses, then we would all be having to
earn our righteousness through the law.
But
the truth is that the promise still stands, because God's contract with Abraham
has not changed.
:19-22
The purpose of the law
:19
Wherefore then serveth the law?
What
is the reason for even having the law then, if righteousness comes through the
promise?
:19
It was added because of transgressions
The
Law's purpose has to do with people's sin.
The
Law's purpose is basically to show man how sinful he is.
It
gives us a glimpse of God's standards of righteousness, and shows us how
impossible it is for us to achieve them on our own.
:19
till the seed should come ...
The
law was to be around until Abraham's ultimate seed arrived, until Jesus came.
:19
it was ordained by angels in the hand of a mediator
Talking
about the law, it was set up with Moses as God's go-between to set up a
temporary system between man and God.
It
was ordained by angels in that angels were involved in getting the covenant set
up with Moses.
It
was the angel of the Lord in the burning bush.
It
was an angel that was in the pillar of cloud and pillar of fire.
The
Scriptures also speak of God appearing with ten thousands of angels at the
giving of the Law (De 33:2; Ps.68:17)
:20
Now a mediator is not a mediator of one, but God is one.
A
mediator is a go-between when two people make an agreement together, and both
have responsibilities.
With
Moses' covenant with God, both man and God had responsibilities.
Man
had to obey.
God
would bless.
With
Abraham's promise, things were different.
The
only person with a responsibility was God.
All
Abraham did was sit there and get blessed.
:21
Is the law then against the promises of God?
Is
Paul trying to say that the law contradicted the promises of God?
Did
the law do away with the promises of God?
Did
the law make the promises no longer effective?
:21
if there had been a law given which could have given life ...
If
God could have given a person righteousness through obedience to the law, He
would have done it.
But
the fact is that it is impossible for a person to achieve righteousness by
obeying the law.
The
best a person can do is to avoid sin, but even then only a little at a time.
You
can't avoid sinning completely.
Eventually you'll break the law.
:22
the scripture hath concluded all under sin
The
Scripture declares that everybody is a sinner, and thus cannot achieve God's
righteousness on their own.
The
Scripture includes the Law.
:22
that the promise by faith ...
Note
Paul's contrast with law and promise.
We're
going back to Abraham's covenant, being one of promise, not by achievement
through obedience.
The
Law's purpose is to show us our sin, and to show us our need for righteousness.
But
the only way to achieve righteousness is simply by believing in God.
:23-25
The Schoolmaster
:23
before faith came
Before
we came to the place where we learned to believe in Jesus.
:23
we were kept under the law ...
NIV
- 23
Before this faith came, we were held prisoners by the law, locked up
until faith should be revealed.
:24
the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ
paidagogos
- a tutor i.e. a guardian and guide of
boys. Among the Greeks and the Romans
the name was applied to trustworthy slaves who were charged with the duty of supervising the life
and morals of boys belonging to the
better class. The boys were not allowed so much
as to step out of the house without them before arriving at the age of manhood.
Before
we came to the point where we trusted in Jesus for our righteousness, the law
served a purpose for us, being our constant companion, reminding us of our sin,
and urging us step by step towards Jesus.
Lesson:
There's
value in the Old Testament!
Paul
is not saying to toss out your Old Testaments.
Instead,
there is great value, the main value being that of showing us our need for
Jesus, and pointing the way to Him.
That
doesn't mean that once we know Jesus we stop reading the Old Testament.
The
New Testament is built on the Old Testament.
I
don't think you can clearly understand the New Testament without a good
understanding of the Old.
:24
that we might be justified by faith
The
Law is only a transitionary device, intended to bring us to Jesus, to trust Him
for our righteousness.
:25
But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster.
Does
this sound like we shouldn't be trusting in the keeping of the Law for our
righteousness?
It
does to me.
:26-29
Applying the promise to us
:26
For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus.
Or,
lit., "sons" of God.
When
we trust in God, having been a child of the devil (John 8), we now become
adopted into God's family, and become His sons.
:27
For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ
He's
not talking about water baptism here.
To be
"baptized" means to be immersed completely.
Scripture
speaks of a sense in which mystically, when we received Jesus, God completely immersed
us into Jesus.
1Corinthians
12:13 For by one Spirit are we all baptized into
one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have
been all made to drink into one Spirit.
Romans
6:3
Know ye not, that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were
baptized into his death?
:27
have put on Christ
In
the Roman soiety when a youth came of age he was given a special toag which
admitted him to the full rights of the amily and state and indicated he was a
grown-up son.
Now
that we have finished our course in the Law, and we graduated to adult sonship
by believing in Jesus, we are given our toga of adulthood, being clothed in
Jesus Himself.
:28
There is neither Jew nor Greek ...
There
are no more differences between people based on the Law
:28
neither bond nor free
There
are no more differences between people based on slavery.
:28
male nor female
It
doesn't make any difference to God whether you're a guy or a gal.
:28
ye are all one in Christ Jesus
All
that matters is that a person is in Jesus.
From
there we're all the same.
:29
If ye be Christ's
If
you belong to Jesus.
:29
then ye are Abraham's seed
Because
having been immersed in Jesus, being clothed in Jesus, you are now in the seed,
which was Christ.
Does
this mean that the Jews are no longer Abraham's seed, and that there shouldn't
be a nation of Israel in the land, but instead the believers should be living
in Israel????
NO!
I
think there's a difference between the physical descendants and the physical
promises of Abraham, in contrast with the spiritual descendants and the
spiritual promises to Abraham.
:29
heirs according to the promise
Now
as the seed of Abraham, we receive an inheritance, the inheritance of
righteousness by faith (see 3:6,7)
That's
the legacy of Abraham.
Summary:
God
made a promise of righteousness to Abraham and his Seed, and the promise still
holds.
The
Seed was Christ.
The
entrance of the law did not change God's original promise to Abraham.
The
very purpose of the law was to show us how sinful we are, and how much we need
a Savior.
The
law only pointed to the very need for God's promise.
Since
we have believed in Jesus, we have been immersed in Him, and now we Gentiles
are allowed to share in the promises to Abraham.